Maker disclosure: I'm on the team behind Lovie, so treat this as maker bias. If you're a non-US (or first-time) founder, setting up a US company used to mean lawyers, paperwork, and a week of waiting. We built Lovie Formation to do it as a 5-minute AI chat instead: pick LLC or C-Corp, Delaware or Wyoming, and it files your EIN and includes a registered agent — often done in under two minutes. It's aimed at AI-first,

I noticed Opus 4.6 got a bit weird right before 4.7 dropped. It felt more repetitive, more locked into the same patterns, and sometimes just randomly silly. Hard not to look at that and wonder. 4.7 was also burning through tokens way too fast for us, so I had to switch the company account back to 4.6, finished the work.  #CodeAssistant #Chatbots #Comparison

Most AI slide generators only export PDF, which means the moment a client or colleague asks for the PowerPoint file to edit, you're stuck re-doing the work manually. Havi (havi.ai) exports to PPTX that's actually editable — slides, text boxes, and layouts come through intact. I've used it to hand off decks to clients who needed to tweak content after delivery, and it worked without the usual cleanup. The generation s

AI became part of daily work so fast. In a lot of jobs now, it does not even feel optional anymore. For example, I am not a native English speaker, so when I need to write an email in English, I usually use AI. It helps a lot with speed. I can say what I want, fix the tone, clean it up, and just send it. That part is great, no doubt. Same with analysis. Sometimes I just upload an Excel file and ask for the kind o

I think the Claude Mythos thing Anthropic announced is a pretty big deal. They’re basically framing it as their most powerful model yet, but they’re not releasing it publicly in the normal way. Instead they’ve put it behind this closed cybersecurity program, Project Glasswing, and only a small number of organizations get access. And the claims around it are kind of wild. They’re saying it found serious vulnerabilitie

 trying 5.4 a bit and my first impression is it feels more solid when the task gets serious. With 5.3, I already liked it, but 5.4 feels a bit more locked in. Especially when the prompt gets longer, the task gets messier, or you want something that actually holds together from start to finish. I also feel it’s better at coding-reasoning type work than casual chatting. Not saying 5.3 was bad, just feels like 5.4 loses

Claude and other AIs were trained on humanity’s output without paying for it anyway. So from a purely logical point of view, aren’t Chinese models just doing the same thing? #Chatbots #OpenSource

Hi, I’ve seen lots of topics on the internet about how good and cheap this open-source AI is. There are comparisons saying the performance is similar to Opus 4.6 but way cheaper than that. Has anyone tried it? I’d like to hear your experiences and honest reviews. #OpenSource